The game play of PvE seems less consequential than the PvP. There are fewer moments of frantic button mashing followed by cathartic release. Bringing down an enemy ship is less of a rush and the Game Over Screen does not leave me overly proud or regretful. I acknowledge that bots will never be as fun to stomp on as your fellow man, but I think there is more at work here. I would like to address the pacing and the engagement curve of the PvE mode.
I am referencing concepts brought up in the Extra Credits video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LScL4CWe5EWhether intentional or not GOI's PvP adhered strongly to the ideal engagement curve:
1) Initial spot
1.5) No shooting approach phase
2) Guns in range
2.5) First clip expires or first mallet
4) Armor strip
4.5) Armor recover
5) Armor strip again
5.5) Armor recover
6) Final Armor Strip
6.5) Mortars going out
7) Did the mortar hit before armor recover?
7.5) Ship killed
Victory cheer
8.5) Back to spotting
Yet in PvE the steady stream of enemy ships with trivial armor and hull values means the player is at a constant level of stress with less peaking and release. The obligatory boss ship encounter does up the difficulty but it is more of a steady rise than a peaking and release.
Games like Left 4 Dead handle the engagement curve very well for a dynamic PvE experience. For a lot of the play session the player is moving cautiously with periodic spikes in intensity from special infected. Bigger spikes come in the form of zombie swarms or Tank battles. The players are allowed lulls and safe rooms to reset the base line with the climax being the 2 tank finally with multiple swarms. The desperate rush to the extraction point from the best defensible position providing that last little spike at the end.
I would like Muse to reexamine their AI director and Allicance NPC ship designs with this peak and release design philosophy in mind.
Show Posts