Author Topic: Second spectator ship  (Read 20816 times)

Offline Fynx

  • Member
  • Salutes: 30
    • [Rydr]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Second spectator ship
« on: September 28, 2015, 09:14:04 am »
So every lochnagar mine can be recorded.

Offline Hunter.

  • Community Ambassador
  • Salutes: 23
    • [T.Pr]
    • 20 
    • 33
    • 35 
    • View Profile
    • My Hummingbird (Anime Website)
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2015, 10:22:21 am »
Yes

Offline MightyKeb

  • Member
  • Salutes: 78
    • [GwTh]
    • 38 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2015, 10:58:29 am »
Yes

Offline -Anakin-

  • Member
  • Salutes: 47
    • [Clan]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 19 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2015, 02:16:50 pm »
Yes

Offline Newbluud

  • Member
  • Salutes: 24
    • [T.Pr]
    • 37 
    • 45
    • 38 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2015, 02:20:50 pm »
Yes

Offline GurasOguras

  • Community Ambassador
  • Salutes: 30
    • [GwTh]
    • 38 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2015, 02:21:02 pm »
Yes

Offline DJ Logicalia

  • Member
  • Salutes: 191
    • [♫]
    • 35 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2015, 02:51:43 pm »
Yes

Offline Ayetach

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 77
    • [Muse]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2015, 06:17:53 pm »
Yes

Offline Kamoba

  • Member
  • Salutes: 175
    • [♫]
    • 30 
    • 34
    • 45 
    • View Profile
    • Robin and Magpie Leather
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2015, 01:28:14 am »
Yes

Offline Piemanlives

  • Member
  • Salutes: 155
    • [Cake]
    • 20
    • 16 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2015, 01:46:24 am »
Yes

Offline Sammy B. T.

  • Member
  • Salutes: 154
    • [Duck]
    • 23 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2015, 05:18:38 pm »
Yes

Offline Dryykon

  • Member
  • Salutes: 10
    • [AI]
    • 29 
    • 31
    • 26 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2015, 06:07:20 pm »
Yes

Offline Richard LeMoon

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 284
    • [Muse]
    • 33 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2015, 07:41:15 pm »
I would rather have replay. Potentially infinite spectator ships, sans the extra lag.

Offline Arturo Sanchez

  • Member
  • Salutes: 119
    • [AI]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
    • My spaghetti channel
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2015, 06:45:17 am »
I would rather have replay. Potentially infinite spectator ships, sans the extra lag.

kind of asking the impossible. limited spectators was precisely why there was lag (one of them at least)

Offline Fynx

  • Member
  • Salutes: 30
    • [Rydr]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: Second spectator ship
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2015, 10:44:54 am »
kind of asking the impossible. limited spectators was precisely why there was lag (one of them at least)

That depends on the game engine and how much data is being sent to client.
It's a good idea actually. Saves like that would be recorded on client side in binary files and possible to play in game. And share. It's actually a really good idea, as long as the game engine is not constructed in a way that completely prevents that.