Author Topic: orignal flamethrower  (Read 48196 times)

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #45 on: June 24, 2013, 04:41:30 pm »
...Flame Junkers vs Metamydions anyone?

Offline James T. Kirk

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 182
    • [Cake]
    • 19 
    • 25
    • 43 
    • View Profile
    • The Cake Official Website!
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #46 on: June 24, 2013, 05:47:49 pm »
...Flame Junkers vs Metamydions anyone?

Cullen, It's time to break out the Birthday Cake.


Not only is fire the only damage type to be over 1x effective on more than a single ship system (besides ramming), it's pretty empowering.
Ask anyone who's crewed on my double-flamer/incendiary manticore Goldie. If we manage to lock down a ship and just set everything ablaze, I turn into something like the 21 second mark in this: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=VYxh0wCrVYk#t=21s). Mild language.

Competitive? Maybe not (no, really, I have no idea, never played competitively). A nice switch from the meta? Most certainly.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2013, 05:49:41 pm by James T. Kirk »

Offline -Muse- Cullen

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 47
    • [Cake]
    • 13 
    • 23
    • 20 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #47 on: June 24, 2013, 06:08:05 pm »
...Flame Junkers vs Metamydions anyone?

Cullen, It's time to break out the Birthday Cake.

http://i.istockimg.com/file_thumbview_approve/10804518/2/stock-illustration-10804518-birthday-cake-on-fire.jpg

Banshee front, two banshee right, gat/flak left. For the most part, we only use the right side trifecta of banshees... Fireworks galore... The enemy ship can't do anything about it. I think we might as well change the gat flak side to mercs or flamers.

Offline Squidslinger Gilder

  • Member
  • Salutes: 287
    • [TBB]
    • 31 
    • 34
    • 45 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #48 on: June 24, 2013, 06:19:55 pm »
...Flame Junkers vs Metamydions anyone?

Competitive? Maybe not (no, really, I have no idea, never played competitively). A nice switch from the meta? Most certainly.

You can't do it in competitive play because allies are capable and will assist. Having your ship exposed trying to kill a flamed enemy will only get you focused down. Cannot risk that against gat/flaks. In pub play you can sit there forever burning someone to death and their ally won't give a crap.

Offline James T. Kirk

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 182
    • [Cake]
    • 19 
    • 25
    • 43 
    • View Profile
    • The Cake Official Website!
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #49 on: June 24, 2013, 06:36:27 pm »
You can't do it in competitive play because allies are capable and will assist. Having your ship exposed trying to kill a flamed enemy will only get you focused down. Cannot risk that against gat/flaks. In pub play you can sit there forever burning someone to death and their ally won't give a crap.

I know this will never happen, but this just gave me the image of three Squids rising up from the mist on Canyon Ambush, intercepting a formation of enemies, locking down all three simultaneously, and winning a match.

Once again, not a viable tactic, but fun to envision.

Offline Serenum

  • Member
  • Salutes: 12
    • [Cake]
    • 15 
    • 19
    • 28 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #50 on: June 24, 2013, 08:20:29 pm »
You can't do it in competitive play because allies are capable and will assist. Having your ship exposed trying to kill a flamed enemy will only get you focused down. Cannot risk that against gat/flaks. In pub play you can sit there forever burning someone to death and their ally won't give a crap.

I know this will never happen, but this just gave me the image of three Squids rising up from the mist on Canyon Ambush, intercepting a formation of enemies, locking down all three simultaneously, and winning a match.

Once again, not a viable tactic, but fun to envision.

One day I will put togheter 3 squids on the same team and win the game with the power of confusion.
Mark my word.

Offline James T. Kirk

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 182
    • [Cake]
    • 19 
    • 25
    • 43 
    • View Profile
    • The Cake Official Website!
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #51 on: June 24, 2013, 08:24:16 pm »
One day I will put togheter 3 squids on the same team and win the game with the power of confusion.
Mark my word.

Sign me up.

Offline MasX

  • Member
  • Salutes: 26
    • [Gent]
    • 8
    • 11 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #52 on: June 24, 2013, 08:32:34 pm »
I laugh at todays flamethrower

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #53 on: June 24, 2013, 08:51:27 pm »
I laugh at todays flamethrower

I join.

Offline MasX

  • Member
  • Salutes: 26
    • [Gent]
    • 8
    • 11 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #54 on: June 25, 2013, 06:53:34 am »
i forgot who it  was but somebody on my crew was like let 1 engine burn it makes good ground effects 

Offline Surette

  • Community Ambassador
  • Salutes: 24
    • [MM]
    • 16 
    • 45
    • 36 
    • View Profile
    • Personal homepage
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #55 on: June 25, 2013, 10:38:29 am »
I laugh at todays flamethrower
I want to try flying against you with my flame squid.

Offline Plasmarobo

  • Member
  • Salutes: 41
    • [MM]
    • 24
    • 32 
    • View Profile
Re: orignal flamethrower
« Reply #56 on: June 25, 2013, 10:53:45 am »
That flame Squid man.

My solution is just to not let you get close.