Community > Community Events
New Sunday Community Skirmish Rewards
Solidusbucket:
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 07:00:58 pm ---
--- Quote from: BlackenedPies on January 13, 2016, 05:26:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 04:18:51 pm ---
--- Quote from: KitKatKitty on January 13, 2016, 10:21:00 am ---I'm don't feel this really addresses the over all concern for the players who think SCS has become too serious with the same outcome every week and has gone away from the initial idea of it being a practice event to help teams become better not discourage them from competitive.
--- End quote ---
Timmy B was not serious tournament and it had rewards as far as I know, so why SCS shouldn't have them too? Why do you think only serious matches should be rewarded?
--- End quote ---
The concern is that these rewards won't accomplish anything and will only benefit the few teams already at the top: including you and Lueosi. SCS isn't very dynamic with the same teams winning every week and few new joiners. It's great to see recent teams like RAWR and Why So Serious but they don't stand a chance against the established winners
You can only use one title and I doubt any players will flaunt "Skirmisher", but the distinguished elite will proudly display their "Skirmish Champion". Therefore it doesn't help SCS and only benefits the already established winners
--- End quote ---
How is that different than any competitive game out there? Of course best teams will get rewards. Every single top team or player had to practice and earn their place where they are now. If anyone wants rewards, then work for it. I played tournaments even though I knew Rydrs would take golden badge, but so what? At least I know I tried. Should we just drop rewards just because it wouldn't be fair for weaker teams? If they really care that much for rewards, maybe they can be motivated by them to get better.
I don't know about anyone else, but if I was in their places (new players/team) I would be motivated and would feel great accomplishment once I would finally get that reward.
It's same as MMOs for example. You just gotta deal with it, some stuff is hard to get, if you're not willing to put enough work or you don't have time or whatever, you might never get it, it's that simple. Not everyone can have everything. You won't see me complaining about guild wars 2 and legendary weapons for example "Hey, I'm too lazy to grind for hundreds of hours to get that legendary weapon, that's not fair, I don't have as much time as hardcore players". It's good that games have some hard to achieve goals, that's what many people keeps playing.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- I see your point. This is a valid point.
--- End quote ---
Rareform K. Rozhkov:
--- Quote from: Solidusbucket on January 13, 2016, 09:22:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 07:00:58 pm ---
--- Quote from: BlackenedPies on January 13, 2016, 05:26:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 04:18:51 pm ---
--- Quote from: KitKatKitty on January 13, 2016, 10:21:00 am ---I'm don't feel this really addresses the over all concern for the players who think SCS has become too serious with the same outcome every week and has gone away from the initial idea of it being a practice event to help teams become better not discourage them from competitive.
--- End quote ---
Timmy B was not serious tournament and it had rewards as far as I know, so why SCS shouldn't have them too? Why do you think only serious matches should be rewarded?
--- End quote ---
The concern is that these rewards won't accomplish anything and will only benefit the few teams already at the top: including you and Lueosi. SCS isn't very dynamic with the same teams winning every week and few new joiners. It's great to see recent teams like RAWR and Why So Serious but they don't stand a chance against the established winners
You can only use one title and I doubt any players will flaunt "Skirmisher", but the distinguished elite will proudly display their "Skirmish Champion". Therefore it doesn't help SCS and only benefits the already established winners
--- End quote ---
How is that different than any competitive game out there? Of course best teams will get rewards. Every single top team or player had to practice and earn their place where they are now. If anyone wants rewards, then work for it. I played tournaments even though I knew Rydrs would take golden badge, but so what? At least I know I tried. Should we just drop rewards just because it wouldn't be fair for weaker teams? If they really care that much for rewards, maybe they can be motivated by them to get better.
I don't know about anyone else, but if I was in their places (new players/team) I would be motivated and would feel great accomplishment once I would finally get that reward.
It's same as MMOs for example. You just gotta deal with it, some stuff is hard to get, if you're not willing to put enough work or you don't have time or whatever, you might never get it, it's that simple. Not everyone can have everything. You won't see me complaining about guild wars 2 and legendary weapons for example "Hey, I'm too lazy to grind for hundreds of hours to get that legendary weapon, that's not fair, I don't have as much time as hardcore players". It's good that games have some hard to achieve goals, that's what many people keeps playing.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- I see your point. This is a valid point.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Solidus has a great point here. I like titles
lolTSM:
--- Quote from: Rareform on January 13, 2016, 09:23:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: Solidusbucket on January 13, 2016, 09:22:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 07:00:58 pm ---
--- Quote from: BlackenedPies on January 13, 2016, 05:26:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 04:18:51 pm ---
--- Quote from: KitKatKitty on January 13, 2016, 10:21:00 am ---I'm don't feel this really addresses the over all concern for the players who think SCS has become too serious with the same outcome every week and has gone away from the initial idea of it being a practice event to help teams become better not discourage them from competitive.
--- End quote ---
Timmy B was not serious tournament and it had rewards as far as I know, so why SCS shouldn't have them too? Why do you think only serious matches should be rewarded?
--- End quote ---
The concern is that these rewards won't accomplish anything and will only benefit the few teams already at the top: including you and Lueosi. SCS isn't very dynamic with the same teams winning every week and few new joiners. It's great to see recent teams like RAWR and Why So Serious but they don't stand a chance against the established winners
You can only use one title and I doubt any players will flaunt "Skirmisher", but the distinguished elite will proudly display their "Skirmish Champion". Therefore it doesn't help SCS and only benefits the already established winners
--- End quote ---
How is that different than any competitive game out there? Of course best teams will get rewards. Every single top team or player had to practice and earn their place where they are now. If anyone wants rewards, then work for it. I played tournaments even though I knew Rydrs would take golden badge, but so what? At least I know I tried. Should we just drop rewards just because it wouldn't be fair for weaker teams? If they really care that much for rewards, maybe they can be motivated by them to get better.
I don't know about anyone else, but if I was in their places (new players/team) I would be motivated and would feel great accomplishment once I would finally get that reward.
It's same as MMOs for example. You just gotta deal with it, some stuff is hard to get, if you're not willing to put enough work or you don't have time or whatever, you might never get it, it's that simple. Not everyone can have everything. You won't see me complaining about guild wars 2 and legendary weapons for example "Hey, I'm too lazy to grind for hundreds of hours to get that legendary weapon, that's not fair, I don't have as much time as hardcore players". It's good that games have some hard to achieve goals, that's what many people keeps playing.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- I see your point. This is a valid point.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Solidus has a great point here. I like titles
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I think titles are great! Personally I think a title for entry and a sweet badge for winning would be awesome! But I also understand if badges are reserved for larger tournament wins.
Rareform K. Rozhkov:
--- Quote from: lolTSM on January 13, 2016, 09:25:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: Rareform on January 13, 2016, 09:23:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: Solidusbucket on January 13, 2016, 09:22:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 07:00:58 pm ---
--- Quote from: BlackenedPies on January 13, 2016, 05:26:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: T Machine on January 13, 2016, 04:18:51 pm ---
--- Quote from: KitKatKitty on January 13, 2016, 10:21:00 am ---I'm don't feel this really addresses the over all concern for the players who think SCS has become too serious with the same outcome every week and has gone away from the initial idea of it being a practice event to help teams become better not discourage them from competitive.
--- End quote ---
Timmy B was not serious tournament and it had rewards as far as I know, so why SCS shouldn't have them too? Why do you think only serious matches should be rewarded?
--- End quote ---
The concern is that these rewards won't accomplish anything and will only benefit the few teams already at the top: including you and Lueosi. SCS isn't very dynamic with the same teams winning every week and few new joiners. It's great to see recent teams like RAWR and Why So Serious but they don't stand a chance against the established winners
You can only use one title and I doubt any players will flaunt "Skirmisher", but the distinguished elite will proudly display their "Skirmish Champion". Therefore it doesn't help SCS and only benefits the already established winners
--- End quote ---
How is that different than any competitive game out there? Of course best teams will get rewards. Every single top team or player had to practice and earn their place where they are now. If anyone wants rewards, then work for it. I played tournaments even though I knew Rydrs would take golden badge, but so what? At least I know I tried. Should we just drop rewards just because it wouldn't be fair for weaker teams? If they really care that much for rewards, maybe they can be motivated by them to get better.
I don't know about anyone else, but if I was in their places (new players/team) I would be motivated and would feel great accomplishment once I would finally get that reward.
It's same as MMOs for example. You just gotta deal with it, some stuff is hard to get, if you're not willing to put enough work or you don't have time or whatever, you might never get it, it's that simple. Not everyone can have everything. You won't see me complaining about guild wars 2 and legendary weapons for example "Hey, I'm too lazy to grind for hundreds of hours to get that legendary weapon, that's not fair, I don't have as much time as hardcore players". It's good that games have some hard to achieve goals, that's what many people keeps playing.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- I see your point. This is a valid point.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Solidus has a great point here. I like titles
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I think titles are great! Personally I think a title for entry and a sweet badge for winning would be awesome! But I also understand if badges are reserved for larger tournament wins.
--- End quote ---
i think that looking back on all the previous tournaments, that badges are cool. I wanna do more scs. yay titles. i want two titles plz. badges are cool thx. nvm
on a side note: how do you quote someone idk how?
P.S. lel titles. relaaax
Azenkompf:
This went downhill really fast.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version