Info > Feedback and Suggestions
Remove Flamethrower
Jaraxlle:
I have read the arguments here and on the steam community forums. I don't think I come across very clear. So please read this carefully:
The Flamethrower sucks. It changes the combat in the game for the worse. The game is better off without it.
HamsterIV:
I believe The Dude said it best:
Imagine:
--- Quote from: Jaraxlle on February 23, 2015, 05:08:55 pm ---I have read the arguments here and on the steam community forums. I don't think I come across very clear. So please read this carefully:
The Flamethrower sucks. It changes the combat in the game for the worse. The game is better off without it.
--- End quote ---
I have read your argument here. I don't think we've come across very clear. So please read this carefully:
No.
David Dire:
--- Quote from: Dutch Vanya on February 17, 2015, 11:00:05 pm ---I don't think the flamethrower is a fun weapon either. To shoot or get shot by.
--- End quote ---
Pff, you just don't see it's hidden Glory.
Oh, by the way everyone, this has already been discussed on the Steam Forums.
DJ Logicalia:
The flamer has gone through many forms of nerfing and in it's current state (and I say this as an engineer) it's fine. Once you understand the game, it's very easy to counter. And it's 2 words
Chem Spray
In the early game, you learn to spray certain components before you come into contact with an enemy ship that you know has flamers or as you come into contact with that ship. You suffer some fires, but you can recover from them with any semblance of basic engineering. Eventually, you're able to keep a ship sprayed for, basically, the entire game. It's not OP, and it's a very useful weapon I would be sad to see go
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version