Main > Gameplay

Perhaps it's time to discuss mercuries, competitive play and general play.

<< < (3/3)

Calico Jack:

--- Quote from: Plasmarobo on August 14, 2013, 06:50:57 pm ---I think this is a nonissue.

--- End quote ---


I think it is an important issue because while the issue of the mercury will pass, the other part - the suspicion of the existence a two tier playerbase -  won't unless addressed. Or to put it in clearer terms there is already a belief the player base is divided, which has nothing to do with weapons or competitive play.


Captain Smollett:
Yeah I agree with Plasmarobo; I like many forum posters play competitively but the majority of my thousands of matches happened in pub play.

We all play the same game, and most of the competitive players play a lot of it and are very opinionated just like the casual players that play a lot of it.

So we're all the same player base, and I'm pretty confident muse looks at the game as a whole when making decisions. 

Calico Jack:

--- Quote from: Captain Smollett on August 14, 2013, 07:44:31 pm ---I'm pretty confident muse looks at the game as a whole when making decisions. 

--- End quote ---

yes I agree with you on this.

Sammy B. T.:
I think competitive play acts as magnifying class. Imbalances are magnified.

N-Sunderland:
Of the observations I've made in balance threads, 100% of them have been based off of experience in PUG matches. Same goes for most other competitive players. If I was basing my concerns off of competitive matches, then I'd have already started a thread rallying to get the buff hammer nerfed. As you can see, I have not done so.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version