Author Topic: Weapons that suck  (Read 39562 times)

Offline Kharthynogus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 3
    • 1
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #30 on: August 24, 2013, 03:08:39 am »

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #31 on: August 24, 2013, 03:38:35 am »
Half of those Child-Safe scissors...

Offline Riggatto

  • Member
  • Salutes: 60
    • [MM]
    • 41 
    • 37
    • 44 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #32 on: September 10, 2013, 06:01:29 pm »
During WWII the soviets would strap dynamite to dogs and train them to run under the tracks of a tank. It wasn't uncommon for the dogs to run back to the trainer and blow them up instead

Offline HamsterIV

  • Member
  • Salutes: 328
    • 10 
    • 45
    • 45 
    • View Profile
    • Monkey Dev
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #33 on: September 10, 2013, 06:33:05 pm »
I heard that they trained the dogs to run under the center of tanks (where they could easily fit without getting crushed). They would carry a backpack with a antenna that acted like a trigger when it scraped against the bottom of the tank. In training the dogs would run under the tank and get rewarded for doing so. The theory was the dogs would imprint the idea of running under tanks with a backpack as a sure fire way of getting a treat. Then on their big day the trainers would swap out their training pack for one filed with explosives. Unfortunately they did the training with Russian tanks burning Russian grade gasoline. When the dogs were let out on the battle field they went after what they were trained to run under, things that looked like Russian tanks and smelled like Russian grade gasoline. The results were less than desirable (for the Russians at least).

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #34 on: September 10, 2013, 06:47:02 pm »
Macaroni Art

Never saw anyone win a fight with that.

Offline Plasmarobo

  • Member
  • Salutes: 41
    • [MM]
    • 24
    • 32 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #35 on: September 11, 2013, 07:32:14 pm »
You've obviously never been to kindergarten.

I posit: Nothing.

Offline James T. Kirk

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 182
    • [Cake]
    • 19 
    • 25
    • 43 
    • View Profile
    • The Cake Official Website!
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #36 on: September 11, 2013, 07:49:35 pm »
So nothing is the worst weapon ever?

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #37 on: September 11, 2013, 09:16:54 pm »
So nothing is the worst weapon ever?

well it certainly is better than something...
But not overused as everything...
though anything might be a better choice...

Offline Keon

  • Community Ambassador
  • Salutes: 105
    • [Duck]
    • 26
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2013, 10:52:31 am »
Nothingness kills instantly and leaves no trace of the crime.

Offline Zenark

  • Member
  • Salutes: 41
    • [Cake]
    • 5
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #39 on: September 12, 2013, 01:58:35 pm »
Nothingness kills instantly and leaves no trace of the crime.

How do we even know this 'nothingness' exists?

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #40 on: September 12, 2013, 03:50:31 pm »
Nothingness kills instantly and leaves no trace of the crime.

How do we even know this 'nothingness' exists?

You don't.

That's what's so scary about nothingness....




Loneliness is as scary as it can drive a man to insanity before it kills him...

Offline James T. Kirk

  • Muse Games
  • Salutes: 182
    • [Cake]
    • 19 
    • 25
    • 43 
    • View Profile
    • The Cake Official Website!
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #41 on: September 12, 2013, 06:33:02 pm »
You can never save someone's life.

Only postpone their death.

Offline Keon

  • Community Ambassador
  • Salutes: 105
    • [Duck]
    • 26
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #42 on: September 12, 2013, 06:51:11 pm »
Nothingness kills instantly and leaves no trace of the crime.

How do we even know this 'nothingness' exists?

Nothing fears no man and knows no mercy. None of it's victims have ever lived to tell the tale. Scary, huh?

Offline Letus

  • Member
  • Salutes: 34
    • [SAC]
    • 45 
    • 45
    • 33 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #43 on: September 12, 2013, 07:44:13 pm »
Nothingness kills instantly and leaves no trace of the crime.

How do we even know this 'nothingness' exists?

Nothing fears no man and knows no mercy. None of it's victims have ever lived to tell the tale. Scary, huh?

Then the question is...how do we know if this "nothing" truely exists?


...we don't.

Offline Piemanlives

  • Member
  • Salutes: 155
    • [Cake]
    • 20
    • 16 
    • View Profile
Re: Weapons that suck
« Reply #44 on: September 12, 2013, 07:45:50 pm »
Nothingness kills instantly and leaves no trace of the crime.

How do we even know this 'nothingness' exists?

Nothing fears no man and knows no mercy. None of it's victims have ever lived to tell the tale. Scary, huh?

Then the question is...how do we know if this "nothing" truely exists?


...we don't.

All in nothingness...