Main > Gameplay

Axis-Quadrant Weapon Classification System

<< < (3/3)

Velvet:

--- Quote from: Sammy B. T. on April 25, 2014, 05:33:50 pm ---I guess the way to think about the numbers is not an accounting of their ability but instead an accounting of their specialty. The higher the number, the more specialized the weapon is at its role.

--- End quote ---
true. still I think some guns (hades comes to mind) have been proven equally effective at passive and aggressive usage. yet rating them at 0 would suggest they aren't good at either.
no great solution comes to mind... except summarising their strengths in prose rather than graph form. although, allowing a gun to cover a range rather than a point on the scale might be a decent compromise.  Then you could acknowledge the broader applications of each weapon, eg. allowing gat to edge slightly into control and passive territory to acknowledge it has disable and defensive uses despite being most formidable as an aggressive, kill weapon. That would still make a nice pretty graph, too.

Sammy B. T.:
No because the rating has no bearing on how good something is at the job. These numbers reflect comparative advantage.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page