Main > Gameplay
Sight Design Discussion
N-Sunderland:
No back-seat moderating, thanks.
This has happened lots of times in the past with long discussions in the guns balance thread (e.g. lumberjack discussion a few months back), so there's no reason to be alarmed. It just allows the main thread to focus on other things.
zlater75@hotmail.com:
:-\ That wasn't my intention at all...
But if that's how it appears my sincere apologies.
The fact about the sight, i tried to discuss with others, that had the same point, in the sticky thread, about it here was the numbers on the sight are the wrong way. It has to be a larger number for the position of sight that gives you longer range on the LJ. Design is fine imho. No other "rants, derails or comments" about it. I just felt misunderstood here. Now twice. :(
N-Sunderland:
Once again, you didn't do anything wrong. The discussion in general was just starting to take up a lot of space in that thread, so it was moved here.
Anyways, I don't want to derail this thread anymore.
zlater75@hotmail.com:
Just to say.. nvm the confusion.. was explained why this topic was made.
All i can say on topic is the LJ sight "2" should be "1" and viceversa from a gunners PoV.
Lochiel:
Not to disagree with Genozide; but to encourage the continuation of the discussion.
The marks on the sights need to correspond to something in game, otherwise their orientation don't matter.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version