Main > Gameplay
Lumberjack / Typhoon Arming Distances
Moriarty:
interesting! then again in its current form maybe Typhoon would be more apt
Letus:
--- Quote from: Watchmaker on May 21, 2013, 11:43:49 am ---No comment on balance, I just wanted to mention that the heavy flak is named the Typhon, not the Typhoon.
--- End quote ---
I pronounce it Typhoon D<
'cause if used correctly, that gun is concentrated death....just like a Typhoon would be in this world!
...
fine I'll fix that.
RearAdmiralZill:
They don't want to admit they forgot the extra "o."
Letus:
--- Quote from: RearAdmiralZill on May 21, 2013, 03:55:52 pm ---They don't want to admit they forgot the extra "o."
--- End quote ---
At least either way, it's a deadly thing
One being a mythical creature, the other being a tropical storm in the Pacific Ocean.
NikolaiLev:
I don't think the Typhon needs much. It's incredibly powerful even inside its minimum range, at least on a Galleon or Spire. It's pretty much useless on a Goldfish, simply because they nerfed Explosive (.3 from .5) so it can't deal with Armor very well.
Something we could do is increase the minimum range to 350m or so, and then make the arming time a linear dropoff in damage; its hard minimum range is 150m where it deals half its damage. Then, the closer you get to 350m the more AoE damage it does, until it deals full damage at 350m. This would make it less of a binary thing, as much as it wouldn't make realism sense at all.
We could also shift damage from its AoE to its Direct damage.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version